Did you know?

Based on the results, the performance of the 300 PRC bridges the gap between the 338 Lapua and the 300 Norma. This was very interesting to us – the 338 Lapua was the king of long range tactical shooting and the 300 Norma took off as a lighter and faster bullet out of the same case. As I’ve noted above, I am not a fan of the 300 …The advantages of the 300 Norma over the 300WM are another 10 grains of water case capacity and the availability of Lapua brass. Berger loads the 230 Hybrids ~125 fps faster in the Norma than the WM. That'll cost 1/4 to 1/3 of the WMs barrel life. In practice, it's like moving a 2000 yard target about 100 yards closer.Re: 338 Norma -vs- 338 Lapua (Savage 110BA) i did plenty of research before building my norma... i can seat the 300 OTM's mag length in the AICS, right @ 3.634 i can get a tad longer but sometimes get some feeding issues... the case seems more efficient, as i can push the 300grn bullet @ 2900 fps with roughly 86.5 of RL22, you really cant beat it, even with the lapua... especially if you can ...1. 2. 3. Next. TC338. Well-Known Member. Joined. Sep 13, 2015. Messages. 588. Location. Central Oklahoma. Sep 9, 2017. #1. I'm interested in the opinions of those who frequently shoot beyond 1500 yards on these two cartridges for long range hunting. Which would you choose and why? LastShot300. Well-Known Member. Joined. Feb 3, 2014. Messages. 73.300 norma mag vs 338lm vs 338nm. Planning my next rifle build, and I am torn between 338LM , 338NM and 300NM. I like the idea of using 30 cal bullets on one hand, but I also like the appeal of 338 in both the lapua and the norma. Barrel life is not a concern for me. Any input, would be great. Don't discount the good old 300 Winchester Magnum. The 338 Lapua has a flatter trajectory at distances over 1,000 yards, but the difference is not considerable. Under 1,000 yards, the two rifle cartridges are virtually identical. For example, at the 1,000 yard-line the 338 Lapua as dropped -288” while the 300 Win Mag is at -296”. That’s not all that much difference at such a long distance. The 338 Lapua has a flatter trajectory at distances over 1,000 yards, but the difference is not considerable. Under 1,000 yards, the two rifle cartridges are virtually identical. For example, at the 1,000 yard-line the 338 Lapua as dropped -288” while the 300 Win Mag is at -296”. That’s not all that much difference at such a long distance.Sep 10, 2017 · I'll go you one better and include the .338 Norma Mag as well. Working with the uppermost accuracy node for each, there is only nickels and dimes difference between the remaining energy and remaining velocity, including out to 1,000 yards, based on my velocities. Both 300 Win Mag and 338 Lapua are excellent cartridges for long-range shooting and hunting. The 300 Win Mag is a popular choice due to its faster muzzle velocity and lower recoil. It is also more affordable and more commonly available. However, the 338 Lapua has a larger bullet diameter, more energy, and longer range. It is a better choice for ...Re: .338 Norma mag. vs .338 Lapua mag. (accuracy) Thanks LL, Never heard of Hypertex. A freind has a .300 NM, I've been part of it from the start. The load is 81gr N570, 230gr Berger 215M, 2950 fps. Gun is a laser to 900-1000 yards. Turns into a crapshoot at 1350 & 1450 yards, the farthest we've shot it.The .300 Win Mag vs .338 Lapua Magnum is an interesting comparison, and we think provides some interesting points of discussion. While there is some overlap in the applications of these rounds, there are also going to be certain shooting situations where one might be better suited than the other. And that’s the goal of this article; we are not …Decorating, enjoying, and then planting a living Christmas tree can be a wonderful “green” holiday tradition. Expert Advice On Improving Your Home Videos Latest View All Guides Lat...The .338 Lapua Magnum (LM) has been the next greatest “mainstream” sniper caliber for the last 30-plus years. It was designed to be the ideal “in-between” round. That is, in between 7.62×51 and .50 … The .300 Norma Magnum, also known as .300 NM or 300 Norma, is a centerfire magnum rifle cartridge developed by Swedish ammunition manufacturer Norma Precision.The .300 Norma Magnum uses a .338 Norma Magnum parent case necked down to .30 caliber, named to differentiate it from the older .308 Norma Magnum designed in 1960, and has begun to gain popularity among long-range shooters. With short light huning bullets the 338 Norma gives the least range and energy,, but with 300 grain VLD bullets and a 3.6" magazine limiation I consider the 338 Norma the best of the three. I chose the 338 Norma Mag over the 338 Lapua as it too suffers if restricted to a 3.6" magazine, though not as much as the 338 RUM or 338-378Wby.338 Win Mag (250 gr): The 338 Win Mag has 44.49 ft-lbs of recoil, which is significant, but still not nearly as much as the 338 Lapua. 338 Lapua (250 gr): This cartridge has 65.47 ft-lbs of recoil, meaning it has 47% more recoil than the 338 Win Mag. It has the most powerful recoil of any cartridge in this comparison.Cost Lapua is cheaper in certain calibers. Examples (308 win) not (6.5/284) Other people report outstanding results with Norma over Lapua again in certain calibers 300 WSM and (6.5/284 returned to 284 win) but not in others. You will be really pleased with Norma Brass if you have access to it at a reasonable price.

Most shooters and hunters have heard of the .338 Lapua (8.6×70mm or 8.58×70mm), which received its status as a 1500 meter sniping round. A .338 Lapua launches 250 grain bullets over 3000fps and 300 grain bullets over 2850fps, with good hand loads and sub 1/2 moa accuracy. The .338 Lapua Magnum cartridge, designed in the …338 Lapua 300 grain Berger elite hunter at 2725 FPS (Berger reloading data) The Lapua is 29.09 inches (2.77 MOA) lower than the Norma mag at 1000 yards, but the Lapua has 390 ft lbs of energy left. Once again I'm kind of comparing apples to oranges here but the drop alone on the Norma mag is impressive with more than enough energy to kill an ...You can see a huge range of cartridges, including the 338 Lapua Mag, and precision cartridges like the 6.5 Creedmoor, 6 Creedmoor, and 6.5×47 Lapua, and larger cartridges like a 7mm Rem Mag, 6.5-284, and even the 28 Nosler. But, 5 cartridges seemed to be most popular, with several people using each of these: 6.5 PRC. 300 Norma Mag. 300 PRC.Based on the results, the performance of the 300 PRC bridges the gap between the 338 Lapua and the 300 Norma. This was very interesting to us – the 338 Lapua was the king of long range tactical shooting and the 300 Norma took off as a lighter and faster bullet out of the same case. As I’ve noted above, I am not a fan of the 300 …Im Lauf der Jahrzehnte gesellten sich zur .338 Win. Mag. noch einige stärkere Kaliber wie die .340 und .338-378 Wby. Mag., .338 RUM, .330 Dakota, .338 A-Square oder 8,59 Lazzeroni Titan. Schließlich sprang das Militär mit den Scharfschützenpatronen .338 Lapua Mag. und .338 Norma Mag. auf den Zug auf. Selbst für Unterhebelrepetierer gibt es eine …

Norma is faster and lapua extra damage is negligible. I use the spr for range so I like as much velocity as possible, otherwise I'd be using the KAR. Norma. There’s really no debate. Better bullet velocity, significantly less bullet drop, and more mobile. The Lapua will help if you’re hitting body shots, but this isn’t MP, it’s Warzone.338 has better terminal ballistics, but if you aren’t in some sort of special forces unit or hunting elk at 1200 yards, 300 is the way to go. 338 LM gets my vote. High quality brass (Lapua) is easily obtainable and barrel life is really good. Recoil on my 338 LM rifle is surprisingly tame with a muzzle brake.…

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. The Difference Between .338 Lapua vs .308 Winchester: 50. Possible cause: May 24, 2012 · I like that the 300 norma has a better selection of bulle.